Salary benchmarks for 24 markets
What SEO pays country by country and city by city, on one comparable scale.
Twelve questions about how you like to work, scored across the six directions an SEO career actually takes — with the roles, salary bands and reading that go with each.
Runs in your browser. Every calculation on this page happens locally in JavaScript. Nothing you type is transmitted, logged or stored, and the page works offline once loaded.
SEO is not one job. After the first couple of years almost everyone drifts toward one of six specialisms, usually by accident. Choosing deliberately is worth several years of progress.
| Direction | Suits people who… | Ceiling |
|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO | want reproducible answers and enjoy systems | High, with the best risk-adjusted pay evidence |
| Content & editorial | think in arguments and audiences | Moderate as a writer, high as a strategist |
| Analytics & measurement | want to know whether it actually worked | High, and portable well beyond SEO |
| Digital PR & authority | are comfortable with people and rejection | High in digital PR, low in transactional link building |
| Strategy & leadership | prefer deciding to doing | Highest in-house ceiling |
| Freelance & consulting | want control and can tolerate variance | Uncapped, with a floor of zero |
For the underlying salary data behind each, see the compensation hub and career comparisons.
The most valuable practitioners in the market hold two of these directions credibly. Technical plus analytics. Content plus strategy. Digital PR plus content. Consulting plus any deep specialism.
The reason is straightforward: the pool of people who are good at one is large, and the pool who are genuinely good at two is small. If the quiz gave you a clear first and second, that pairing is a more useful career plan than the winner alone.
It does not know your market, your financial obligations, your visa situation, or whether you have a manager worth staying for. Those constraints usually matter more than preference. Use the result as an input to a decision you make with real information.
Choose on two criteria: the work you can sustain doing for years, and where the applicant pool is thinnest. Technical SEO currently scores well on the second across every market we track. But a specialism you dislike will not survive contact with a difficult year, so fit matters more than any pay table.
No. Lateral moves within SEO are common and cheap, because the shared foundation — search intent, indexation, measurement — transfers completely. The usual route is to take on work in the new specialism inside your current role for six months, then move with evidence rather than intent.
Generalists do well up to about the mid level and then flatten, because the roles above that are defined by depth or by scope. If you do not want to specialise technically, the alternative is to specialise in scope — take the management or strategy path — rather than staying a generalist individual contributor.
It is a prompt, not an assessment. It reflects the preferences you reported in the last two minutes. Its value is in surfacing a direction you had not considered and pointing you at concrete reading, not in telling you what you are.
Figures on this page are aggregated market estimates compiled from the sources above and are intended for orientation, not as an offer, guarantee or valuation. See our salary data methodology.
The parts of this site people find most useful next.
What SEO pays country by country and city by city, on one comparable scale.
Salary calculators, offer comparison, skills assessment and interview prep.
Twelve roles with responsibilities, requirements, KPIs and templates.
Every term you are expected to know, defined for people who use them.